New film reviews are all spoiler free!
Oldies are a little more in depth!
If you want to suggest a film for me to review tweet or Facebook us!

Friday, 7 December 2012

Team Stryker by Andrew Grieve (Review)

http://www.teamstrykercomic.com/
Team Stryker is a biweekly online indie comic by Andrew Grieve that lovelingly mocks the beefcake action war heroes of computer games, films and comics. Featuring a fun mix of hard and soft boiled characters the first two full missions (or issues) have been released and feature insane situations, I get the feeling they could end up literally anywhere and as issue three points out any when, as they end up fighting a dinosaur with a phd back in the past.

The comic clearly focuses on exploiting the characters for brilliant comedy which is spot on my taste so I have found every issue and pretty much every page a laugh. I think my favourite character is the strong and silent Jeffrey... The butterfly...
Although Jeffrey aside all of the characters are fantastic, I love the dynamics off the group and despite them being based (loosely) in real people the characters feel very influenced by lots of pop culture. Every time Eagleheart shouts Eagle Punch! I have to try not to say it in Captain Falcon's voice although I'm sure Eagleheart would never be as camp as Cap' Falcon. Dead Eye makes me think of Snake from MGS, I love that he seems to be the most competent and blood thirsty of the group. Casanova is always a laugh although I can't see how he got into the group, shouldn't he be... getting laid? And V Scope, well I love the concept for his character, a snapshot typical character that is easily distracted and never convering the team when he should be... Sneaky Jeffrey! Although no Jeffrey in #3 :( I hope he becomes a big villain, you read it here first, Jeffrey will be the mastermind behind the first big arc, the Moriarty to Eaglehearts Sherlock... a perfect analogy...

The art and colouring as well as writing is all done by Andrew himself which is always a commendable feat and I have to say the comic looks pretty sweet, I have only read it online, it would be nice to buy a paper copy sometime so I can really inspect the artwork. The slightly cartoony panels work really well and all the art is real nice, the pannelling is pretty basic but always works well, I think the page above is my favourite panellling wise. As for the look of the characters, they are all decent beefy action heroes that can appropriately kick ass.

Team Stryker is a definite one to watch, I will be keeping my ye on the new pages every week for sure! The satirical angle on action heroes isn't exploited enough and especially not in comics. I think what I would personally like to see would be a few slightly closer parodies of characters that we know really well. Perhaps a Gears of War or Halo reference and even more some Marvel comics piss takes would be great to see and god knows some of the beefier characters deserve it, Im thinking Hulk, Punisher, Hercules. I would like for the webpage to have a slightly easier page browsing system but I have no idea how that would work, I can barely work blogger! Anyway a wicked effort and an inspiring one too, its really nice to see someone with an idea and a little skill put together something as coherent and professional. Well Done Andrew!
7.5/10

If you want to get more info you can follow Andrew @TScomic
https://twitter.com/TSComic
or on FB
http://www.facebook.com/TeamStryker?fref=ts
To read the comic itself go to
http://www.teamstrykercomic.com/mission001page00/

Thursday, 6 December 2012

CBT Iron Man #3, All New X Men #3, Spider-Man #699, Thunderbolts #1, X Factor 248, Avengers #1

Lots of wicked comics this week, its a good day to be a marvelite!

Iron Man #3
Another great issue of the new volume of Iron Man hit the shelves this week, continuing the escaped extremis storyline Tony ditches his modifiable liquid suit for a more tailor made armour, specifically focused on stealth! Using this new suit he infiltrates the home of a big drug boss who has the extremis, SPOILER Finding a girl infected he believes it is against her will and becomes all visible again.... unfortunately she is there of her own will and after the ensuing battle Tony confronts the big drugs overlord and discovers all he is trying to do is save his cancer ridden daughter. With Tony's help the girl survives END OF SPOILER! This issue kept up the good run from issues 1 and 2, the light humour is well balanced with deep sentiments and unique techno jargon. Page 13, the splash page beginning the battle of the comic is awesome, probably one of my favourite of the comic so far, it seems Land's art is at its best when it is in action. The panneling in this issue is simpler but the images themselves are superb, the three exoskeleton nobody's that battle Tony give Land a good chance to have fun with his art (something Gillen and Spencer talk about in Decompressed in Gillens site, check it out!) and it looks great! The three best things about the comic were the sandwich, black widow and the last line, Awesome!
8.5/10

All New X Men #3
All New X Men this week was another pretty basic book full of exposition, at least this time however it was with characters that matter, not out of time character that will hopefully leave... soon! Cyclops' team begin the issue by setting up the base of their revolution, the old weapon x facility, and they plan to fill it. However the phoenix force doesn't make it that easy, Cyclops' teams powers are faulty and failing, which is proven as Magneto fails to stop a truck and Cyclops' blast overpower his visor and appear more concussive than ever before, this leads to them breaking Emma out in a more destructive way than they had planned. An Emma who cannot use her telepathy and is pretty pissed with Scott about it. Its clear from this issue and from Bendis' interviews these two are over but that doesn't mean she is off the team as they teleport to a new emergence of a mutant. The comic is pretty simple, well written of course and it is nice to see a little more phoenix fall out, the best parts are the slightly soppy but weighty argument between Mags and Cyke, and the final splash page which is one of the best pictures of the series for sure!
8/10

Amazing Spider-Man #699
Firstly Dan Slott gets too much shit on twitter! Readers need to have a little trust! That being said I expected more from 699, I have only read up to spider island then 697,698 and 699 but I was left wanting. As its the end of an era and a big change for the book I expected a more epic feeling to the book, its not that the storyline isn't impressive or well thought out I just feel like its just another spidey story, not the spidey story to end all peter parker spidey stories. People are going on about him getting blood on his hands and being put through the ringer but I dont think its been all that bad, not yet anyway. As you may know I'm not a big fan of Ramos' art but this is one of his better issues for sure. The book is well written, its nice to see a whole comic from inside peters head, looking back on doc ock's life but it feel a little rushed, like that one comic could have easily been two or three. Maybe its my current lack of Spidey fandom but 699 didnt get me all that excited, it just didn't feel epic...
7.5/10


Thunderbolts #1
The new Thunderbolts team is a big switch up, with only one member of the cast being a returning character (venom, although it was a different venom), the team is to be led by Red Hulk/ Thaddeus Ross, I'm afraid I have no idea where he stands in the universe but his recruiting tactic was pretty cool. I am quite a big fan of Way's run on Wolverine Origins so this book caught my eye and it seems to be written just as well. Not too wordy but long enough that you dont feel robbed, it is a shame however that Dillon has reunited with Way as I am not a fan, I dislike the basic pastel like drawings and have never liked a single nose he has drawn. I like the red and black look of the team and am looking forward to seeing them interact as this was more of a recruiting issue, and a simple one at that.
7.5/10

X Factor #248
This weeks X Factor is a nice relaxing laugh, full of ridiculous circumstances to solve a hell of a cliff hanger Pipp's death amounts to nothing important, well not a death anyway. The story however introduces the Hell on Earth story that is to be the big thing for issue 250 which looks sweet. The callback to previous actions of the characters within this comic is commendable but as Peter David has written all 98 issues of Xf I am not surprised with the continuity. The art is still a little off, I dislike the pencils in general, everything seems a little too twisty but it is readable. It was cool to see Lyla using her force field offensively and I am looking forward to an action packed next issue. I am a little disheartened by the lack of Madrox's classic internal monologues and wish they would feature more heavily again along with the series returning to its noir routes although I think its a little past that now.
7.5/10



PICK OF THE WEEK!
Avengers #1
Wow... just wow. I am not a big Avengers fan I generally collect X Men but I thought hey its MarvelNow what better time to start, and what a brilliant start. I will start with the negatives, Opena's art... I am undecided on whether I like it or not, there is a horrid looking hulk, but some wicked stuff too but the whole style in general worked a lot better for avengers than I expected. I have read Uncanny X Force which he worked on for a long time and the style of art works really well for that series so I wasn't sure if it would work, it definitely gave the avengers less of a star spangled feeling and a much more of a dark pessimistic comic. The new logo or at least style of the previously and next symbols are awesome fresh and interesting! Now... onto the writing, perfectly placed and paced action to keep the book interesting, bad ass looking villains(although they look like they should be in Uncanny X force), an intriguing conversation by two of the "big three" avengers and a wicked voice over narration throughout that climbs to an awesome ending that has me truly excited for more! An Epic comic and an Epic start to MarvelNow's Avengers!
9/10

Wednesday, 5 December 2012

Night of the Living Dead (Romero 1968)


Night of the Living Dead is simply THE classic zombie movie, it is undoubtedly the film that sparked the modern zombie genre. Inspired the siege of the house in Richard Matheson's vampire novel I Am Legend, George A Romero created his own house siege in Night with the stars being surrounded by ghoulish humans back from the dead and hungry for human flesh, these ghouls were later identified by the press as Zombies and that is what they became. Night is a story all about power, made in the 60's a time of cultural fear and anger over the Vietnam War the comparison between the ghouls and 'gooks', Vietnamese, isn't difficult to see but its not the only reading to be made. Romero himself says

"To me, the zombies have always just been zombies. They've always been a cigar. When I first made Night of the Living Dead, it got analysed and over analysed way out of proportion. The zombies were written about as if they represented Nixon’s Silent Majority or whatever. But I never thought about it that way. My stories are about humans and how they react, or fail to react, or react stupidly. I'm pointing the finger at us, not at the zombies. I try to respect and sympathize with the zombies as much as possible."

So maybe Zombie's aren't an encoded metaphor for anything and more a simple plot device however that doesn't stop anyone from decoding many messages from the film. It seems however that it is the humans that need to be analysed and read into arguments of race, family and gender are clear.

The film opens with a clear American flag, a simple signifier that the characters in the film, along with the zombies, represent all of America which gives significance to the first conversation. Barbra and her brother discuss why they bother driving down to the cemetery in the town they used to live to plant a wreath on the grave of their father about whom Johnny remarks coldly  "I don't even remember what the guy looked like". This clear breakdown of the atomic family is representative of the time in which traditional values were disintegrating and foreshadows the later scene in which Karen Cooper kills her parents in an even more extreme signifier. Another of the traditional values to be attacked in this first scene is the church, when Johnny sees Barbra praying  he simply says in a dismissing tone "Come on church was this morning". After Johnny is attacked Barbra begins to flee in a hysteric manner thus displaying her generally passive and pathetic character that could be accused of being a typical horror female. There is a lot of evidence against this however specifically in Stephen Harpers "They are us" Representations of women in George Romero's Living Dead Series" in which Harper excuses Barbra's character as either an attack on how patriarchal society makes women or a satirical comment on typical horror heroines.

As Barbra escapes one stumbling Boris Karloff esque zombie into thee refuge of an abandoned house that becomes the main set and the victim of the aforementioned siege. The lighting within the house is spectacular, the black and white visuals are lit in moody squares as if through the windows, the spooky effect is perfect and haunting. A few random shots of animal heads frighten Barbra further showing her hysteria and possibly referencing Hitchock's Psycho from 1960 furthering the possibility that Romero is mocking classic horror/ thriller females.

Barbra is saved however by the main hero of the film, Ben an African American man who stamps his authority on the situation and kills zombies left right and centre. Although Ben was never written as a black character he is one of the first back leads in film that don't have a romantic partner and his presence alludes to the ever present zombie theme of racism. Ben's later death is a harrowing experience and Romero himself has said that it isn't a reference to Martin Luther King's assassination but when he was transporting the film to the studio to be printed he heard of MLK's assassination and thought there was a creepy parallel. Ben's character takes control and boards up the house before telling Barbra and the audience his story which is amazingly delivered and evokes fear and empathy in the audience.

The reliance of our survivors on the media becomes apparent as they perch by the radio which imparts small gems of knowledge calling the zombie outbreak an "explosion of mass homicide  in which victims are "partially eaten by their attackers". Even Ben is reliant on some greater force as he believes that if they survive long enough "someone is bound to come and get us" thus highlighting the public's reliance on government to save them from situations of danger. Whether Romero sees this as positive or negative is unclear as when people do come to help they do the exact opposite and kill Ben. Romero has said in commentary on his other films that he thinks its funny that if this ever happened it would only be the government and the red necks that would be able to defend themselves, an interesting if not frightening idea.

The arrival of more zombies outside the house is clear as they stumble along eating bugs and bark to delay their hunger. Clearly seen in the foreground is a naked female zombie, this goes some way towards supporting the argument that Night is a feminist film as the woman is in no way sexualised but just there wondering round like the others. With the arrival of more zombies comes the arrival of Harry, Tom and Judy from the cellar down below, after hearing the noioses and hiding they finally decided to find out what was going on, finding Ben and beginning the ever present power struggle between Ben and Harry, Black and White. Ben never falters simply saying "go back down into the cellar, you can be boss down there."

The breakdown of the modern family is contained in the cellar, within the family of the Coopers, father Harry, mother Helen and ill daughter Karen are hiding out in a hope to survive. They however are not happy as Helen states "We may not enjoy living together, but dying together isn't going to solve anything" and ironic foreshadowing again of their soon to be death. Again the television and media leads them astray or at very least leads them as the Vietnam like footage of search and destroy missions tells them that their best chance is to get to a refugee centre. Whether it is right or not Ben is willing to do it because "the television says its the right thing to do" Ben saying "television" not scientist or government official is extremely important as it shows that he doesn't so much believe the specialist as he does the media that control his actions.

Ben's plot to save them by fuelling the fire fails and the young love of Tom and Judy fails and dies with is, a pessimistic statement about relationships and sacrifice. Harry sees this as a chance to overtake Ben, he believes he has gone too far and when Ben drops his gun to deal with a Zombie it is snatched by Harry. He however doesn't have the guts to shoot Ben who wrestles the gun from him and shoots him. Its every man for himself as the Zombies break the house down, the women however band together as Barbra finally starts to be productive. Her heroism is shortlived however as Johnny arrives at the house and pulls her into the horde.

Meanwhile Ben retreats into the basement where Karen has been eating her father and stabbed her mother to death in a horrifying scene. The trowel scene is brilliant, the slanted lighting  canted camera and screeching soundtrack all make for a horrifying death, all the more scary for the corrupted innocence of the young girl Karen Cooper, who destroys the atomic family completely.

Ben does survive the onslaught by killing the Coopers and hiding in the basement as per Harry's original suggestion. However as he steps into the light in the morning he is killed by a search and destroy squad who believe he is a zombie, this scene bares a stark resemblance to lynch mobs of the time. In the following photo montage Ben is grabbed with hooked poles and thrown on the fire as one of the gang simply say "thats another one for the fire". Exactly what Romero is trying to say with Night isnt perfectly clear, there are a lot of motifs and a lot that can be re read into the film but at its heart the horror and fear are clear and the anti government possibly nihilistic sentiments are clear.

Whether you see Night as a political statement or just as a good scare one thing is perfectly clear, it is a masterpiece!
9.9

Tuesday, 4 December 2012

"They're US": Representations of Women in George Romero's 'Living Dead' Series by Stephen Harper

"They're US": Representations of Women in George Romero's 'Living Dead' Series is an essay by Stephen Harper which analyses the feminist views on the Living Dead series. The essay itself is well written, well informed and well evidenced, concluding in a persuading argument for Romero as a feminist film maker. Not only does this persuade readers that Romero is a feminist film maker but that he has represented women in not just binary passive/ active or positive/ negative but questions "the ability of binary categories of gender to comprehend the fluidity and diversity of images of women."

In Night of the Living Dead (1968) his representations of women are as passive, inactive characters who do little to help the cause. Whilst that would seem incredibly negative Harper flips this around in a few ways. The strongest proof for Night as a feminist text is the argument that the females passivity is the fault of the overly aggressive patriarchal males who force them down, thus making Night not a critique of weak women but a critique of patriarchal society. This is evidenced first by Johnny's playful teasing "They're coming to get you Barbra" which Harper argues is not a reference to the zombies but "playfully foreshadows the aggression of all the men at various points in the film.". The other main piece of evidence is a piece of speech from Tom who says "if all three of us were working together" things would be easier, Harper points out the important people Tom is talking about are the three male characters. This is a little weaker in my mind as it is Tom is trying to force Ben and Mr Cooper to get along, the women aren't involved in the conversation, however maybe the point is that they should be involved. The final evidence for a feminist reading of Night is the character of Mr Cooper who is an extreme stereotype of a controlling patriarchal male, however his constant fight for control is evident and it is worth noting the young female character fights back against him finally devouring his body. Harper argues it is Mr Coopers "authoritarian personality" that epitomises the male oppression within Night and excuses the female characters passive behaviour. Finally another possibility is that "Night might be read as a satirical comment on traditional representations of women in horror cinema" this is definitely a possibility when you consider the satirical content ofDawn of the Dead (1978).

Harper than moves over to an analysis of Dawn of the Dead (1978) in which the heroine is much more active but not an opposite to the passive feminine character of Barbra. Fran is a more complex character she is a professional in her field and is a strong character who is "consummately articulate and aware of the men's sexist assumptions about her". She is also pregnant and feminine and often takes on typical gender rolls such as nursing, home making and mothering. There are two specific scenes Harper analyses one being the scene in which Fran sits opposite a zombie, a pane of glass separating them and the other a scene in which she succumbs to capitalist desires making herself up with expensive lipstick and mascara. The first scene, with the 'softball zombie' shows Fran's "commendable sensitivity as she sees it as both her unborn child and identifies with is an oppressed and forgotten woman. The second scene sees Fran as a "mannequin" who "applies her lipstick" and "adopts the vacant gaze of the stereotypical consumer". Whilst it would be easy to read this scene as an anti-feminist scene showing a woman steeped in capitalism, make up and stereotype that is only what is on the very basic surface. A closer reading of the scene shows that "Romero refrains from criticising Fran for her participation in the makeup ritual and focuses instead on the social pressures that work to turn intelligent women into consuming mannequins." Harper concludes this section by fairly summing Dawn up as a film in which Romero "critically examines the many possible images of femininity available to women in the 1970's"

Day of the Dead (1984) and the remake of Night of the Living Dead (1990) written by Romero and directed by make up artist guru Tom Savini. In Day, Sarah is the most active female of the series, she flips the roles of Night as she acts as "protector for her emotionally shattered partner". Haper notes that Day offers the clearest parallel between humans and zombies through Professor Logan and Captain Rhodes; "Professor Logan's objective is to 'condition and control' these unruly creatures, just as Captain Rhodes seeks to control (both professionally and sexually) the ungovernable Sarah". The main point of Day is a continuation of the theme in Dawn that Sarah is a strong and active female that "also acts in a caring stereotypically motherly fashion towards her partner". Harper's analysis of the remake of Night is interesting however I don't personally count it as one in the series. Harper sums Night up as a representation of the limitations of feminism as well as a visual parallel of the differences between women in the 60's and in the 90's.

Harper sums the whole series up as positive towards women and as feminist texts that don't just show women as active and passive. The development of women in the films is clear and the fact that Romero has managed not to fall into the pit holes of strong sexist action heroes and over sexualisation is commendable. When I personally analyse Romero's thee most recent zombie films I will keep this article in mind and see if Romero has continued to fight for feminist values.

Sunday, 2 December 2012

Sons Of Kreel

Sons Of Kreel is a new indie comic by Glenn Makin and James Eskdale that premièred at thought bubble this year. I got the pleasure of meeting these two creators in person and getting this awesome commission by James
But anyway back to the comic at hand, Sons of Kreel #0! This action packed taster teases the audience with a look at the characters to be featured in the series in the future. And what a glimpse it is! The two main characters Kasimir and Morritz, a teacher and student both assassins of Kreel. We are given very little back story and the lore and myths surrounding the Kreel assassins are something we are going to have to wait to find out but what we do know is that they are outcasts and that their enemy are the clerics one of which clashes with the pair in the exciting climax of #0. It seems that there is also some sort of magic available in the world which makes it all the more interesting. The art throughout the comic is fantastic, a mixture of dynamic panelling, great pencils and movement lines make the action in the book flow really nicely not to mention the awesome splash of Bastor Vetori which is truly stunning. The comic is in grey-scale  whether that is a cost thing, a stylistic decision to reflect that it is set 10years before the main series or if its just a personal choice by Glenn and James it somehow makes the comic feel more assassiney which is good.... its a wicked choice and it well pulled off for whatever reason.

With Sons of Kreel comes a little peek at the characters to come which look awesome. I also purchased the new characters book, a collection of stories about characters within the Sons of Kreel universe. Whilst they didnt shed much light on the universe or the sons of kreel they were awesome stories that have me really excited about whats to come. The whole world feels like its been carefully considered and there is a lot of directions for the comics to go so I am looking forward to getting steeped in good myth and fantasy. I recommend this to all! Whilst there isnt much for you to purchase right now keep your eyes on these guys I expect lots of good things from them in the future. If you are into you fantasy, your dnd, your Game of Thrones the comic and character book are two things you shouldn't miss!
8./10

Find out more about sons of Kreel at these sites:
http://www.facebook.com/WorkOfGlennMakin?fref=ts
http://www.facebook.com/JamesEskdaleArt

Saturday, 1 December 2012

Poetic doc shooting


We have been shooting our poetic doc for the last few days at Stanley Tools, here is my shot list for the shooting days:
X
#
SHOT
Action
Notes
S.

1
MED
Urbexers go down the stairs

Ariel shot
2

2
CU
Silhouette goes past round window

Expos for outside
2

3
MED
Urbexer walks from behind cam into darkness

2

4
MED
Urbexer walks from darkness over cam
Opposite of sh3
2

5
CU
Aaron with cam in front of face
Background should be 1 point perspective
3

6
CU
Aaron with cam in front of face
Background should play on square motif
3

7
LONG
Aaron Defacing a window. Shot from behind him to hide identity.
Try exposing for outside and inside lighting
3

8
MED
Track of urbexers looking at graffiti timed cam flash and walk away
DOLLY
1/
3

9
LONG
Light version of chair and tv tracking shot
DOLLY
3

10
MED
Lighter shot Peacock graffiti or urbexers shooting the graffiti
PAN
2

11
MCU
Tracking shot of the windows

DOLLY (like the practice shot)
2

12
LONG
Long shots of the large rooms, position urbexers CU and LONG
One urbexer left+close
Other right+long
2/
3

13
MED
Bathroom, peeling walls and vegetation in better light

2

14
LONG
Shot of the outside of Stanley tools.

Show the urbexers entering
2


So how did it go? Really well, the lighting was a lot better, much more helpful, and we had lots more time with the urbexers to get more relevant footage. We were a little restricted on the first day as the Airsofters that us the pace were using a few of the rooms however we got to move about during different times of the day so that was great. On the second day we were a little short on time but we had long enough to get the last few shots we needed so it went really well. After the first day me and Steve, the director, reviewed alll of the footage we has shot and were really happy with what it all looked like, we used the final day to get the last few shots noticed we needed and wrapped yesterday. 


Thursday, 29 November 2012

Zombie's from 68 to 2012


The use of the word zombies or Xombi's started a long time before cinema, and even when it crept into cinema it was not the zombies common audiences would recognise. It all began with Hatian Zombies who were slave masters controlled by their slaves with Vudoo. As interesting as these zombie films are and as enticing the comparison between the two types of zombies are there have been a large number of changes to the classic "Romero" zombies who are considered the first of modern zombies in Night of the Living Dead (1968 George A Romero).

"Romero is the Shakespeare of zombie film, and this is his Hamlet" (Peter Dendle The Zombie Movie Encyclopedia 2001) Nobody could put it better and Zombie's started with him in Night Of the Living Dead (1968). Romero was never trying to reinvent the Zombie movie or make a new monster in fact he was mimicking the creatures from Richard Matheson's I Am Legend, in that novel the creatures are warped vampires however Romero dulled down the creatures and took away their main weaknesses and was left with a new creature of his own. The word Zombie is never used in the film and Romero never called them zombies himself but that is what the press decided to name them in their widely mixed reviews of the film. Romero's zombie is frighteningly simple, its out their waiting, if it catches you it will try and kill you, you have to shoot it in the head, if you die you will turn into one of them! Finally zombies want you for one thing, food. There are many themes within Night of the Living Dead and despite what many reviewers said at the time, there is definitely a lot of subtext behind what many called B movie trash. It was one of the most graphic films of the 60's and is in my opinion an early precursor to many 70's horror films that focused on blood and the evil within us all. Contrary to horror in and before the 60's that focused on the alien enemy, the outsider, the foreign, Night focuses on the enemy within, not only does it criticise the nuclear family and racism but it is popularly seen as a critique of the Vietnam war. The ending credits specifically are referencing lynch mobs and the burning of bodies, television footage also mimics that of news footage of Vietnam. There is a lot of evidence for all of Romero's subtexts and it is evident in all of his other zombie films that his work is a critique of society that just uses zombies as a plot device to make people listen and watch.

Romero's zombie can still seen today and has gone through many variations including those that call out brains, those that come from the grave and there have been dozens of proposed reasons for their existence, radiation, poison, Vudoo, magic, curses, the devil, disease ect. The most recent and most important change came to screen in 2002 in the form of the Rage infected masses of 28 Days Later (Danny Boyle 2002). The significance of 28 Days Later is partly to do with its time as it is seen as one of the first of the new wave of zombie media, 2002 was a ripe year, with war in high swing and made in the always government protesting England, the inward looking genre was bound to do well again. Danny Boyle known for Trainspotting and Sunshine is a "gritty" director who aims for realism and bleak imaginations of pretty basic stories. 28 Days Later fits into this bleak category for sure but more importantly the "rage" virus somehow made audiences see the infected as a new more believable zombie, whether this is because of how little is explained about the virus or because of a lack of knowledge about science is beyond me but it worked. The other big change is the running, this was introduced in earlier films but never really took off and was never as scary as it is in 28 Days Later these running zombies are literally infected with a virus that... makes them angry, rather than eating you they want to kill and beat you. Still pretty horrifying and there is still a lot about them that don't make sense but this most recent movie iteration of the zombie has been copied many times now although most films just take the running bit, the question is why?

Personally I think the move to running zombies has to do with the audience, its not the 60's anymore and if you show a modern audience the zombies of NOTLD they don't really care, they are desensitised to that kind of horror, there needed to be a new level. Of course Romero's zombies can still be scary, Romero himself proved that in Diary of the Dead,  Land of the Dead, and Survival of the Dead  but it takes a master to add that kind of fear, thrill and tension. The slow horror film is a dying breed instead (and really since the late 70's) we have slashers and action, thriller horror hybrids. There is no time for intelligent critique and slow drama, it has to be fast, have explosions and be on a massive scale. The remake of Dawn of the Dead (Zack Snyder 2004) is one good example of this kind of zombie film, it is a clear Hollywood blockbuster of a film, it mixes all the kinds of high octane action you expect from Hollywood but loses the B movie charm and character depth of Romero's films. It is still a brilliant film, and still a successful film but it is a different monster, as is the zombie itself.

It is however the opinion of Romero himself that the reason for the change was video games in an interview with Vanity Fair he said
"it’s just the influence of video games. I don’t think there’s anything deeper to it than that. Filmmakers saw what was happening in video games and started thinking, “Well, we’ve got to keep pace and make our zombies fast too.” I still don’t agree with it. If zombies are dead, how can they move fast? My guys don’t run. They never have and they never will. They’re just lumbering oafs that are easy to dispose of unless you make a mistake. Those are the rules, and I’ll stick with what I’ve got."
An interesting and probably correct theory however it disregards the reason that computer games themselves moved from slow moving to quick zombies. The main game series that illustrates this change is Resident Evil, in the first 3 games had slow moving Romero style zombies, admittedly there were other fast creature out to get you like Lickers and Hunters but the zombies stayed the same until Resident Evil 4 which came out in 2005, years after quick zombies swarmed the silver screen. I think this change is for exactly the same reason as it is in cinema, audiences getting wanting action horror rather than survival horror. That being said there are a lot of fast paced zombie games and arcade games that did appear before 2002, House of the Dead for example. 

Zombies have changed very little since 2002 and continue to be subtly morphed by different franchises. My personal belief is that whilst the sheer number of zombies in a film is often a scary thing, they should be considered dangerous even by themselves and should be scary by themselves. The mass killing of zombies isn't something I am a fan of, to me sing zombies as cannon fodder is quite poor film making, it is more interesting to spend time on character development than zombie head popping effects! For this reason I dislike the most recent Resident Evil film  (2012 Paul Anderson), which deals with multiple random monsters, zombies, hundreds of head shots, poor acting, poorly written characters and illustrates the reason games aren't often literally translated into films. 

I await the return of the true zombie and of George A Romero, it all started with him and in my opinion his are still the best, no matter how far the genre comes, no matter how much zombies change Romero will always be the Godfather of the Zombie!

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2010/05/george-romero